HPISD Looks to Future With Bond Approval

The passage of the bond package means that
The passage of the bond package means that Bradfield (1), Hyer (2), and University Park (3) elementary schools will be torn down and rebuilt over the next few years, while Armstrong (4) will see several upgrades and renovations. (Photos: Tanner Garza)

Highland Park ISD voters on Tuesday gave the OK for their school district’s facilities to be transformed over the next decade in the face of unprecedented enrollment growth.

Amid very high turnout, Park Cities residents approved the district’s $361.4 million bond proposal by a margin of 54.75 percent to 45.25 percent. There were more than 8,000 votes cast, with a late surge of opposition on election day closing the gap.

It’s the most ambitious bond package in HPISD history by a wide margin, with the most prominent component being the addition of a fifth elementary school, along with the razing and rebuilding of three of the four existing elementary campuses, each of which is at least 65 years old.

Also included are major renovations at Highland Park Middle School and Highland Park High School, including major overhauls and expansions to athletic facilities.

While critics said the proposal lacked fiscal responsibility, transparency, and historical compassion, supporters claimed it would give HPISD the space it needs to permanently accommodate all of its students and educational programs without the need for quick fixes.

“I am grateful to the voters in HPISD for the historic decision they made in this election,” HPISD board president Joe Taylor said in a statement. “For 101 years, HPISD has had a proud tradition of excellence in its schools. Tonight, voters overwhelmingly chose to build on that foundation of success for the next 100 years. This bond election isn’t just an investment in Highland Park ISD; it is an investment in the future of the Park Cities.”

At the elementary level, the fifth campus will be constructed first on 4.6 acres the district will purchase from Northway Christian Church. The district said late Tuesday that work could begin as soon as next spring, and the building could open in fall 2017.

It will be used as a relief school while Bradfield, Hyer, and University Park elementary schools are torn down, one by one, and rebuilt over a three-year period. Then the fifth campus would debut with its own student body thanks to redrawn attendance zones. The new and rebuilt schools all will have two stories and underground parking.

“The real work now begins,” said HPISD superintendent Tom Trigg. “As an administration, we are committed to allocating bond funds wisely and judiciously in implementing the goals of this bond program. Our goal is to continue to make this community exceedingly proud of its schools.”

The high school will see additional classrooms from an addition on the northwest corner of the building, as well as from tearing out the school’s natatorium. Other space accommodations also are part of the plan. The Seay Tennis Center will be moved behind the parking garage to make room for a new multi-sport complex that will house offices and locker rooms for several sports, athletics administration, and meeting rooms, and a new natatorium. A handful of updates for Highlander Stadium also are on tap.

Financially, the bond referendum will likely add more than $1,000 per year to the tax bill for a $1 million home, depending on when the debt is issued and how it’s structured. That would land somewhere around $1.25 per $100 of assessed property value. The term would likely be 20-30 years.

So now that the talk will turn into action, we’ll begin to hear more about implementation timelines, construction plans, and public input on building designs in the coming weeks.

But in the meantime, now that the election is over, what do you think should be the top priorities for HPISD moving forward?

Share this article...
Email this to someone
email
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

7 thoughts on “HPISD Looks to Future With Bond Approval

  • November 4, 2015 at 10:16 am
    Permalink

    “What do you think should be the top priorities for HPISD moving forward?”

    Let’s hope one of the priorities is reworking the ugly proposed design for University Park Elementary.

    Reply
    • November 10, 2015 at 2:14 pm
      Permalink

      ugly doesn’t really get much attention in these things as you may know. the decision makers will do what they want to do.

      Reply
  • November 4, 2015 at 12:10 pm
    Permalink

    I think the top priority is for the community to come together after a heated election. The votes are in and the results are final.

    Reply
    • November 10, 2015 at 2:15 pm
      Permalink

      okay sounds good. come together and do what? didn’t know the “community” was fractured? Not that many folks voted so your worries should be easy to fix.

      Reply
  • November 5, 2015 at 11:59 am
    Permalink

    As
    for the outcome – – We will see informative races for the HPISD Board
    in the future. Too many previous elections have been canceled, after
    only one candidate filed for each position. Too many voters have no
    idea about who is on this board.

    “NO” won
    on Election Day by 408 votes. The other side saw to it that ‘mobile
    voting’ was available at football games and other events during the
    ‘early voting’ period. It made the difference for them – – in spite of
    the passage of HB 2027. I am with those who believe this is an “abuse
    of mobile voting” and another reason the public can not trust the
    current school board.

    Reply
    • November 10, 2015 at 2:16 pm
      Permalink

      the fix is in bro. that isn’t going to change. btw do you want to spend your quality time sitting on this board? One vote nay, 7 votes aye. The aye’s have it…..next item

      Reply
  • November 10, 2015 at 2:13 pm
    Permalink

    This bond program is not impressive. Where was the plan b. no other options. take it or leave it…. Mad for Plaid is going to suffer as a result of the increase in property taxes to fund the debt.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to NealK Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.